Thanks to Dr. Ann Thor for directing me to this concise explanation of the brain and its connections.
I discuss issues pertaining to the practice of neuropathology -- including nervous system tumors, neuroanatomy, neurodegenerative disease, muscle and nerve disorders, ophthalmologic pathology, neuro trivia, neuropathology gossip, job listings and anything else that might be of interest to a blue-collar neuropathologist.
Monday, September 28, 2015
Tuesday, September 22, 2015
Guest Post: How to make your own brain cutting board
Today I am fortunate to host a guest blogger, Dr. Juan Mercado, who is a neuropathology fellow at the University of Alabama at Birmingham under the guidance of Drs. Robert Hackney and Kenneth Fallon. Dr. Mercado studied music from a young age and went to a specialized school of
music in San Juan, Puerto Rico; but during college he decided to exchange music
for medicine and attend the University of Puerto Rico School of Medicine. He has not, however, abandoned his creative approach to the subject matter at hand; in this case, cutting autopsy brains. His guest post follows:
Juan J. Mercado, MD (neuropathology fellow at UAB 2015-17) |
A while ago, as a pathology resident, I was temporarily
in charge of organizing the weekly brain cutting activity. During this event I always felt a little bothered by the
unpredictability and irregularity that occurred with each cut and the
variability of results with each different person trying to pursue the same
goal. I
decided to do some research trying to find more information
about how brain grossing examination was
done in different places. To my amazement, I found out about a brain tissue bank in the United Kingdom that performed their coronal sections with the help of a
tool. This tool enabled them to create perfect
fine cuts every time to perform a complete meticulous evaluation. After knowing
about this, I was highly motivated to perform a DIY project. As I
optimistically anticipated, the results were excellent. I made the tool using materials
that I could easily find in any hardware store. This new and improved tool
could now be made by anyone interested in having the same results.
Materials:
·
Straight cabinet
handles:
they come in different diameters, meaning a different brain slice thickness can
be created depending on this diameter. Also they come in different lengths.
Choose a length proportionate to the size of the cutting board you select.
These bars always come with the screws included. (Fig. 2)
Figure 2 |
·
Drill: to make four holes
·
Rubber O-ring washers: not necessary, but
I use them just for the preservation of the tool, preventing liquids or tissue
to enter in the drilled holes (Fig. 3)
Figure 3 |
·
Rubber chair legs (to elevate the
board from a surface and to hold its placement) (Fig. 4)
Figure 4 |
With the above
materials you can create the basic version that will permit you to create cuts
of only one predetermined thickness based on the diameter of the bar you
select. You can also have an add-on to be able to do thinner cuts with the same
board, but it is not necessary.
Thanks, Dr. Mercado. I have often thought about how nice it would be to have a tool that could simplify and standardize braincutting. I am hoping he builds a limited-edition series of these devices and sells them at the next AANP meeting. Since I am not particularly mechanically inclined, I would be the first in line to purchase what I am hereby dubbing "The Mercado Brain Cutting Device"!
How
it works:
After detaching the
brainstem via an axial cut through the midbrain and then making the first brain
coronal section cut through the middle of the mammillary bodies, proceed as
usual making coronal sections but with the help of the tool
The bars aligned in the way
pictured (Fig. 5) serve to hold in place any brain size firmly while cutting.
Use a rigid knife sliding it above the bars as a guide. In this way the
thickness of the brain sections will be the same as the diameter of the bars
Figure 5 Advantages |
·
Always
the same results, not relying on the experience of the person cutting the brain -- meaning standardization.
·
Homogeneous
leveled slices. Option of creating thin slices help in a more meticulous
evaluation.
·
When
a pathologic finding is present, such as a big intraparenchymal hemorrhage that
normally disintegrates the brain slice if performed by normal technique; it does
not happen with this tool.
·
Better
pictures.
·
It
is a lot faster and the cuts are perfect. Less time cutting, more
learning and teaching.
See for yourself…
Add-on(s):
Optional (need a saw)
A thinner cutting
board cut to fit within the two bars. The diameter of the bar minus the
thickness of this board will be your new brain slice thickness, making the same
board practical for two different thicknesses.
Thanks, Dr. Mercado. I have often thought about how nice it would be to have a tool that could simplify and standardize braincutting. I am hoping he builds a limited-edition series of these devices and sells them at the next AANP meeting. Since I am not particularly mechanically inclined, I would be the first in line to purchase what I am hereby dubbing "The Mercado Brain Cutting Device"!
Wednesday, September 9, 2015
Best Post of February 2015 - The Perils of Crossing Boundaries in the Interstate Practice of Neuropathology: Real or Imagined?
The next in our "Best of the Month" series comes from February 17, 2015:
A provocative article entitled Crossing Boundaries: A Comprehensive Survey of Medical Licensing Laws and Guidelines Regulating the Interstate Practice of Pathology appeared in March of last year in the American Journal of Surgical Pathology (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:e1–e5) which addressed recent judicial interpretations of interstate medical licensure laws. These legal developments are relevant to neuropathologists insofar as we, as a small group of sub-specialists, not uncommonly serve as consultants on surgical cases from outside of our own state. Recent legal judgements have found pathologists guilty of malpractice and even the criminal practice of medicine without a license. Given these recent developments, authors MC Hiemenz, ST Leung, and JY Park surveyed the licensure requirements and laws regulating the interstate practice of pathology. The authors then grouped states according to similarities in legislation and medical board regulations. The survey determined that states define the practice of pathology on the basis of geographic location of the patient at the time of the surgery. Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia allow for a physician with an out-of-state license to perform limited consultation to a physician with an in-state license. However, five states prohibit physicians from consulting out of state unless they themselves hold a license in that state. Other states have limited restrictions, such as requiring that the consultation itself occur within the state. The authors conclude that pathogists who either send cases out to consultants in other states or who serve as consultants to out-of-state pathologists should familiarize themselves with the medical licensure laws of the states from which they either send or receive cases. In a November 2014 letter to the editor, Edward O Cousineau, JD, deputy executive director of the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners, wrote that "the representations in the article, related to how Nevada law applies to out-of-state licensed specialists, are erroneous". In the article, Nevada was represented as being in the category which allows for an out-of-state licensed physician to practice medicine in consultation with an in-state licensed physician, with the additional stipulation that the consultation must occur within the state boundaries. Mr. Cousineau, in representing the Nevada Board, stated that Nevada allows out-of-state consultations without the stipulation that the consultation must occur within state boundaries. Given Nevada's response to the survey, it may be that more states allow out-of-state consultation than the article indicates. Unfortunately, however, the article may have resulted in the unnecessary restriction of certain out-of-state consultations by cautious department chairs
Please comment if you have been impacted by these state licensure issues when either consulting out of state or seeking a consultation from an out-of-state neuropathologist. I'm sure your colleagues would be interested in hearing your story.
A provocative article entitled Crossing Boundaries: A Comprehensive Survey of Medical Licensing Laws and Guidelines Regulating the Interstate Practice of Pathology appeared in March of last year in the American Journal of Surgical Pathology (Am J Surg Pathol 2014;38:e1–e5) which addressed recent judicial interpretations of interstate medical licensure laws. These legal developments are relevant to neuropathologists insofar as we, as a small group of sub-specialists, not uncommonly serve as consultants on surgical cases from outside of our own state. Recent legal judgements have found pathologists guilty of malpractice and even the criminal practice of medicine without a license. Given these recent developments, authors MC Hiemenz, ST Leung, and JY Park surveyed the licensure requirements and laws regulating the interstate practice of pathology. The authors then grouped states according to similarities in legislation and medical board regulations. The survey determined that states define the practice of pathology on the basis of geographic location of the patient at the time of the surgery. Thirty-two states and the District of Columbia allow for a physician with an out-of-state license to perform limited consultation to a physician with an in-state license. However, five states prohibit physicians from consulting out of state unless they themselves hold a license in that state. Other states have limited restrictions, such as requiring that the consultation itself occur within the state. The authors conclude that pathogists who either send cases out to consultants in other states or who serve as consultants to out-of-state pathologists should familiarize themselves with the medical licensure laws of the states from which they either send or receive cases. In a November 2014 letter to the editor, Edward O Cousineau, JD, deputy executive director of the Nevada State Board of Medical Examiners, wrote that "the representations in the article, related to how Nevada law applies to out-of-state licensed specialists, are erroneous". In the article, Nevada was represented as being in the category which allows for an out-of-state licensed physician to practice medicine in consultation with an in-state licensed physician, with the additional stipulation that the consultation must occur within the state boundaries. Mr. Cousineau, in representing the Nevada Board, stated that Nevada allows out-of-state consultations without the stipulation that the consultation must occur within state boundaries. Given Nevada's response to the survey, it may be that more states allow out-of-state consultation than the article indicates. Unfortunately, however, the article may have resulted in the unnecessary restriction of certain out-of-state consultations by cautious department chairs
Please comment if you have been impacted by these state licensure issues when either consulting out of state or seeking a consultation from an out-of-state neuropathologist. I'm sure your colleagues would be interested in hearing your story.
Wednesday, September 2, 2015
Neuropathology Goes Hollywood: "Concussion" Opens in Theaters December 2015
Dr. Bennet Omalu, the first neuropathologist to draw a connections between playing football and the development of Chronic Traumatic Encephalopathy, is featured in a movie starring Will Smith slated to open in December. Check out the trailer!
Not surprisingly, according to a New York Times report, the National Football League intervened in the making of the film so that the final cut would not vilify the nation's most-watched game.
Will Smith portraying Bennet Omalu, MD in the movie "Concussion" |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
Neuropathology Blog is Signing Off
Neuropathology Blog has run its course. It's been a fantastic experience authoring this blog over many years. The blog has been a source...
-
Shannon Curran, MS with her dissection Shannon Curran, a graduate student in the Modern Human Anatomy Program at the University of Co...
-
Neuropathology Blog has run its course. It's been a fantastic experience authoring this blog over many years. The blog has been a source...